About
Academics
Multisport
Photography
Writing

Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

www.adamhodges.com

Thursday, December 16, 2004

Torture, abuse, human rights...and international law

The Bush administration is becoming synonymous with a policy of torture and abuse. As new information continues to emerge, Bush has rewarded many of the key players responsible for perpetuating the attitude responsible for systemic abuse and violations of international law. Bush has affirmed Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to continue in his role during a second administration; and White House Counsel Alberto Gonzalez, who is the author of the leaked January 25, 2002 memo that attempted to justify the suspension of the Geneva Convention, has been nominated to be the new Attorney General (see previous post on Gonzalez.)

As ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero said today in a press release, "This kind of widespread abuse could not have taken place without a leadership failure of the highest order" (14 Dec 2004). That leadership failure certainly includes Rumsfeld, Gonzalez and Bush, among others in the administration.

Will it be more of the same for the next four years or will Americans demand accountability from their officials and respect for human dignity? Will we "abide by a principle long enshrined in our military manuals: That America does not treat prisoners in ways we would consider immoral and illegal if perpetrated by the enemy on Americans", as articulated in a statement by John Kerry a few months ago (20 Oct 2004, Washington Post; cf. 28 Oct 2004, Dworkin)? American values rest on the respect of life and liberty, and condoning torture (implicitly or explicitly) is a self-evident violation of those fundamental values.

Below are resources on the issues of torture, prisoner abuse, international humanitarian law and human rights...in the putative "war on terror."

- Adam

Three Misconceptions about the Laws of War
By Jelena Pejic (29 Oct 2004, Crimes of War Project)

After decades of being debated among the initiated few, the basic concepts of the laws of war seem finally to have captured the public's attention. The rights of prisoners of war, the meaning of humane treatment and the duties of occupying powers are just some of the issues currently being discussed at both international conferences and dinner tables. The bright spotlight directed at international humanitarian law (the preferred designation for the laws of war) is welcome news for those who care about the protection of persons affected by armed conflict. However, there is also a risk of interpretations that do not take into account the delicate balance between state security and individual rights that underlies this body of rules. Outlined below are three examples:

1.      The existence of a global "war on terrorism"

2.      "Unlawful combatants" have minimal (or no) rights

3.      Different rules of interrogation for different detainees

Read full article...

Torture
By Nicole Pope (Crimes of War: The Book)

Torture is used not just to hurt physically, but also to humiliate the victim, which is why prisoners are often left naked during torture sessions, and rape or pain inflicted on the genitals are among the most commonly used forms of torture. In fact, attacks of a sexual nature are so widespread in time of conflict that Article 27 of the Fourth Geneva Convention specifically refers to the treatment of women who should be defended against "rape, enforced prostitution, or any form of indecent assault." Protecting human dignity in all circumstances is in fact the whole spirit behind the Geneva Conventions.

Read full chapter...

Information resources:

Media coverage:

"No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

~ The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 5 (1948)